Given the stakes of this election, to ask for a recount in the precincts that might be problematic, seems both prudent and wise. If there were no interference issues, we would know. Otherwise, many of us cannot fathom the country we now live in.
Thanks so much for this article. It sums up a lot for those unfamiliar. I have been following voter fraud for 24 years (since 2000 when the tabulators became computerized) and there have been inconsistencies every year since. Computers allow thousands, if not millions, of votes to be flipped or added. The only 2 limitations of their system, IMO, are 1) if the Dem candidate is too popular (Obama) as to make the fraud obvious and 2) they don't know exactly how many votes to flip prior to the election and may miscalculate (Biden) and lose (which infuriated Trump).
A thought occurred to me: January 6, 2021, several Republicans challenged the votes of several states on the House floor, and they continued this after the insurrection, as well. I suggest that Democrats do likewise this time around. The GOP have no right to complain about this tactic.
If Musk's Starlink did some tampering with the voting process....and it is increasingly becoming more likely at this point....then Kamala Harris and President Biden should call for an investigation immediately.
Well it does create new meaning for reports that Musk claims Trump wouldn’t be president if it weren’t for him. On the other hand he could be talking about his shambolic ground game.
I shared with major news outlets. Haven't heard peep so far. I posted on blueskysicial platform. It's in Twitter - that's a rigged platform itself if course. I'd say write letters to the editor to local newspapers and larger outlets and/or call them ask why no one is covering this?? Thanks for your input
I definitely want to see this investigation PROCEED. 7 swing states? I’m in. This also just makes sense to question then proceed with careful investigation. I think the idea of a Trump “mandate” just isn’t true. He just can’t stand to lose. I’m willing to wait. Damn straight. Dana in Denver
Everyone reading this needs to go to this page and contact everyone possible on it. Ask that they publicly call for a recount and audit in swing states, and ask them to urge VP Harris to do so.
Kevin McKinney- As an election mathematical analyst for the past 12 years, the methodology that Mr. Spoonamoore has created for finding "Bullet Ballots",( # Trump votes minus # downballot race votes/ # Trump votes) does NOT, in the vast majority of cases, represent the number of "bullet ballots." It is, however, a sum of multiple voter preference nuances. I can show you raw sample data from an exit poll in Arizona that can better explain. Additionally, many independents do not vote for Party as do 95% of Republican and Democrats and they often vote, for example, Trump for President and a Democrat for downballot races (and vice-versa). North Carolina has a huge independent base that supported Trump, which highly likely why NC has such a large numbers of "Bullet Ballots" The BEST indicator for "Bullet Ballots" is to look at the "undervotes" for downballot races, which literally signifies how many ballots did not cast a vote for a particular race. I have pulled data from 2020 and now 2024 by state and compared OVERALL voters of Presidential and US Senate races to find the percentage of undervotes is nearly identical from 2020 to 2024. FYI- that percentage of undervotes is usually around 1% between President to US Senate but, again, can vary depending on many nuances. If you'd like to discuss further, please comment thanks. Phil
If I understand you correctly, you're saying that it's not uncommon for people to split their tickets among parties. Are you saying thatTrump votes minus downballot race votes/Trump votes would not equal the percentage of "only the top of the ticket" Trump "bullet ballots"? But can you explain this a bit more? It would also be great to see that raw sample data from the Arizona exit poll that you mention.
It seems that if they split their tickets, the total numbers of votes (for all candidates) in the down ballot races would be higher than if they didn't vote in those races. But because (as a general thing), people may be a bit less likely to vote further down the ticket, I'm not sure how one could tell whether the total number of votes in down ballot races reflected ticket-splitting or simply not voting.
As far as I can tell, Spoonamore used the same formula to compare his metric of "bullet ballots" for swing states with nearby non-swing states, and found much lower percentages of (what he regards as) bullet ballots for the swing states. How could that be explained? Are you saying that people in swing states are more likely to split their tickets? That's certainly possible. But I'd love to see a hand count in critical precincts just to make sure everything is on the up and up.
Emmy- the best way to explain is to look at demographical votes distributions from from a swing state phone exit poll- and I have one we performed in Arizona on November 10th where we asked political preference, presidential preference, and US Senate preference. Assuming substack allows, I’ll post a screenshot ASAP
Known Russian involvement in the bomb threats coupled with the suspect votes means likely fraud.
Remember, the Mueller Report found that there was evidence of Russian involvement with Trump's campaign in 2016 even though there was "not enough evidence to prosecute"
As much as I want this to be true, I can't see Harris and the Dems going to the wall over this.
Joe Biden will ride off into the sunset (if he hasn't already), Kamala and her people will somehow divvy up whatever money is left over from the campaign coffers while preserving their viability for the future, and the republican noise machine will effectively intimidate anyone who tries to raise the issue on a broad level.
Don't rock the boat, in other words, and just wait to try again under the same old system in 2026, if Trump hasn't already ripped up everything by the roots and turned America into a historical relic.
Everyone reading this needs to go to this page and contact everyone possible on it. Ask that they publicly call for a recount and audit in swing states, and ask them to urge VP Harris to do so.
I keep seeing this. I wouldn’t be surprised by anything the slime oozing into DC did and if they did it I’d love to see them go down the tubes (Kojak reference), however, the “data” I keep seeing presented for my state does not fit with what is being reported by NC BOE.
According to NC BOE, a total of 5,724,001 ballots were submitted, 5,699,152 votes were cast for President, 24,849 ballots had no vote for President, 5,591,588 votes were cast for Governor. So the maximum number of President only ballots possible is (5,699,152 - 5,591,588) + 24,849 =132,413 (not 350,000 as stated in the letter.
The margin of victory for Mr. Orange was 183,048 so even if every one of the 132,413 possible President only ballots was a bogus orange vote they didn’t change the result.
Everyone reading this needs to go to this page and contact everyone possible on it. Ask that they publicly call for a recount and audit in swing states, and ask them to urge VP Harris to do so.
Has anybody verified the data that the Spoonamore guy has about the bullet ballots that were put in to increase Trump's vote totals? I read an article on the liberal Daily Kos website that questions how he got that information, or how accurate it is, such as the 350,000 extra Trump votes from bullet ballots in North Carolina.
I am in NC. I looked at the final data from NC BOE. 350,000 is not correct. The maximum possible number of President only ballots is 132,443 (based on total ballots submitted, total votes for all Presidential candidates, number of ballots with no vote for any Presidential candidate, and total number of votes for all Gubernatorial candidates. The spread between Trump and Harris was 183,048 so even if every possible President only ballot was a bogus ballot for Trump there could not have been enough of them to change the result.
That said I wouldn’t be surprised at anything the slime oozing back into DC did to gain power and if they did it they should all go down the tubes (Kojak reference).
Given the stakes of this election, to ask for a recount in the precincts that might be problematic, seems both prudent and wise. If there were no interference issues, we would know. Otherwise, many of us cannot fathom the country we now live in.
Write on
Thanks so much for this article. It sums up a lot for those unfamiliar. I have been following voter fraud for 24 years (since 2000 when the tabulators became computerized) and there have been inconsistencies every year since. Computers allow thousands, if not millions, of votes to be flipped or added. The only 2 limitations of their system, IMO, are 1) if the Dem candidate is too popular (Obama) as to make the fraud obvious and 2) they don't know exactly how many votes to flip prior to the election and may miscalculate (Biden) and lose (which infuriated Trump).
Sure. Interesting insights. The subject isn't taken seriously enough. Thanks for your input Sally
A thought occurred to me: January 6, 2021, several Republicans challenged the votes of several states on the House floor, and they continued this after the insurrection, as well. I suggest that Democrats do likewise this time around. The GOP have no right to complain about this tactic.
If Musk's Starlink did some tampering with the voting process....and it is increasingly becoming more likely at this point....then Kamala Harris and President Biden should call for an investigation immediately.
Well it does create new meaning for reports that Musk claims Trump wouldn’t be president if it weren’t for him. On the other hand he could be talking about his shambolic ground game.
How do we amplify this and get some traction?
I shared with major news outlets. Haven't heard peep so far. I posted on blueskysicial platform. It's in Twitter - that's a rigged platform itself if course. I'd say write letters to the editor to local newspapers and larger outlets and/or call them ask why no one is covering this?? Thanks for your input
Also share this story link with folks
Excellent article Kevin. Sharing!
I definitely want to see this investigation PROCEED. 7 swing states? I’m in. This also just makes sense to question then proceed with careful investigation. I think the idea of a Trump “mandate” just isn’t true. He just can’t stand to lose. I’m willing to wait. Damn straight. Dana in Denver
Def SHARING!!!
Everyone reading this needs to go to this page and contact everyone possible on it. Ask that they publicly call for a recount and audit in swing states, and ask them to urge VP Harris to do so.
https://blog.voteforlove.net/2024/11/20/unhack-the-2024-presidential-election/
We're running out of time.
TikTok
I heard back from a Washington Post columnist who I mailed several times about this. I will not name him, but will quote him:
"This is all horseshit and you can stop emailing about it because it is horseshit.
Thanks."
So, perhaps we will not be getting a story from the Washington Post on this.
Kevin McKinney- As an election mathematical analyst for the past 12 years, the methodology that Mr. Spoonamoore has created for finding "Bullet Ballots",( # Trump votes minus # downballot race votes/ # Trump votes) does NOT, in the vast majority of cases, represent the number of "bullet ballots." It is, however, a sum of multiple voter preference nuances. I can show you raw sample data from an exit poll in Arizona that can better explain. Additionally, many independents do not vote for Party as do 95% of Republican and Democrats and they often vote, for example, Trump for President and a Democrat for downballot races (and vice-versa). North Carolina has a huge independent base that supported Trump, which highly likely why NC has such a large numbers of "Bullet Ballots" The BEST indicator for "Bullet Ballots" is to look at the "undervotes" for downballot races, which literally signifies how many ballots did not cast a vote for a particular race. I have pulled data from 2020 and now 2024 by state and compared OVERALL voters of Presidential and US Senate races to find the percentage of undervotes is nearly identical from 2020 to 2024. FYI- that percentage of undervotes is usually around 1% between President to US Senate but, again, can vary depending on many nuances. If you'd like to discuss further, please comment thanks. Phil
A Recount in key states and key precincts can answer the source of bullet ballots. If it was clean, nobody needs to worry about a thing.
Hi Phil,
If I understand you correctly, you're saying that it's not uncommon for people to split their tickets among parties. Are you saying thatTrump votes minus downballot race votes/Trump votes would not equal the percentage of "only the top of the ticket" Trump "bullet ballots"? But can you explain this a bit more? It would also be great to see that raw sample data from the Arizona exit poll that you mention.
It seems that if they split their tickets, the total numbers of votes (for all candidates) in the down ballot races would be higher than if they didn't vote in those races. But because (as a general thing), people may be a bit less likely to vote further down the ticket, I'm not sure how one could tell whether the total number of votes in down ballot races reflected ticket-splitting or simply not voting.
As far as I can tell, Spoonamore used the same formula to compare his metric of "bullet ballots" for swing states with nearby non-swing states, and found much lower percentages of (what he regards as) bullet ballots for the swing states. How could that be explained? Are you saying that people in swing states are more likely to split their tickets? That's certainly possible. But I'd love to see a hand count in critical precincts just to make sure everything is on the up and up.
I don’t see a way to post a screenshot- I have the AZ exit poll as well as analysis of undervotes from 2020- 2024
Emmy- the best way to explain is to look at demographical votes distributions from from a swing state phone exit poll- and I have one we performed in Arizona on November 10th where we asked political preference, presidential preference, and US Senate preference. Assuming substack allows, I’ll post a screenshot ASAP
Is there any correlation between voting precincts that received bomb threats and the bullet ballots?
Yes. Many of the same precincts with suspect votes experienced bomb threats. Not sure the number
That's where they should start.
Known Russian involvement in the bomb threats coupled with the suspect votes means likely fraud.
Remember, the Mueller Report found that there was evidence of Russian involvement with Trump's campaign in 2016 even though there was "not enough evidence to prosecute"
As much as I want this to be true, I can't see Harris and the Dems going to the wall over this.
Joe Biden will ride off into the sunset (if he hasn't already), Kamala and her people will somehow divvy up whatever money is left over from the campaign coffers while preserving their viability for the future, and the republican noise machine will effectively intimidate anyone who tries to raise the issue on a broad level.
Don't rock the boat, in other words, and just wait to try again under the same old system in 2026, if Trump hasn't already ripped up everything by the roots and turned America into a historical relic.
Agree , it’s Time to do our part!
Everyone reading this needs to go to this page and contact everyone possible on it. Ask that they publicly call for a recount and audit in swing states, and ask them to urge VP Harris to do so.
https://blog.voteforlove.net/2024/11/20/unhack-the-2024-presidential-election/
I keep seeing this. I wouldn’t be surprised by anything the slime oozing into DC did and if they did it I’d love to see them go down the tubes (Kojak reference), however, the “data” I keep seeing presented for my state does not fit with what is being reported by NC BOE.
According to NC BOE, a total of 5,724,001 ballots were submitted, 5,699,152 votes were cast for President, 24,849 ballots had no vote for President, 5,591,588 votes were cast for Governor. So the maximum number of President only ballots possible is (5,699,152 - 5,591,588) + 24,849 =132,413 (not 350,000 as stated in the letter.
The margin of victory for Mr. Orange was 183,048 so even if every one of the 132,413 possible President only ballots was a bogus orange vote they didn’t change the result.
Everyone reading this needs to go to this page and contact everyone possible on it. Ask that they publicly call for a recount and audit in swing states, and ask them to urge VP Harris to do so.
https://blog.voteforlove.net/2024/11/20/unhack-the-2024-presidential-election/
Has anybody verified the data that the Spoonamore guy has about the bullet ballots that were put in to increase Trump's vote totals? I read an article on the liberal Daily Kos website that questions how he got that information, or how accurate it is, such as the 350,000 extra Trump votes from bullet ballots in North Carolina.
I am in NC. I looked at the final data from NC BOE. 350,000 is not correct. The maximum possible number of President only ballots is 132,443 (based on total ballots submitted, total votes for all Presidential candidates, number of ballots with no vote for any Presidential candidate, and total number of votes for all Gubernatorial candidates. The spread between Trump and Harris was 183,048 so even if every possible President only ballot was a bogus ballot for Trump there could not have been enough of them to change the result.
That said I wouldn’t be surprised at anything the slime oozing back into DC did to gain power and if they did it they should all go down the tubes (Kojak reference).
When is this going to happen!